Affiliate disclosure: PetFoodRankings earns commissions from qualifying purchases. This never influences our rankings or scores. See our affiliate disclosure
Head-to-head

Nulo MedalSeries vs Orijen Six Fish: Which Dry Cat Food Wins?

๐Ÿ—“ Data updated October 26, 2026 ๐Ÿ“ Scores from the published methodology
88/ 100
Nulo

Nulo MedalSeries Turkey & Cod Recipe Grain-Free Dry Cat Food

$$ ยท $3.67/lb ยท dry

Full review โ†’
91/ 100
Orijen (Champion Petfoods)

Orijen Six Fish Grain-Free Dry Cat Food

$$$ ยท $6.67/lb ยท dry

Full review โ†’

The short answer. Three points separate the two best dry cat foods in this ranking, and Nulo is the value story: 41% as-fed protein โ€” a point higher than Orijen on the label โ€” four named animal ingredients in the top five, and about $2.05 per 1,000 kcal against Orijen's $3.57. Orijen's edge is quality of form and history: its top five are all whole named fish worth a perfect protein score, and Champion Petfoods' 40-year zero-recall record against Nulo's sixteen co-packed years. Buy Nulo for the arithmetic; buy Orijen if the manufacturing record is worth 74% more per calorie.

Side by side

Every number below comes from the manufacturer's current label or current US retail listings, scored on the same 6-dimension model. Shaded cells mark the better value on that row.

AttributeNulo MedalSeries Turkey & Cod Recipe Grain-Free Dry Cat FoodOrijen Six Fish Grain-Free Dry Cat Food
Overall score88 / 10091 / 100
Protein quality & source (30%)95100
Ingredient transparency (20%)8080
Nutritional standards (18%)8084
Recall history & safety (14%)8695
Value for money (10%)9994
Owner & pal feedback (8%)8990
Protein (as fed)41.0%40.0%
Protein (dry matter)45.6%44.4%
Fat (min)20.0%20.0%
Fibre (max)4.0%3.0%
Moisture10.0%10.0%
Calorie density3,953 kcal/kg4,120 kcal/kg
Price per lb$3.67/lb$6.67/lb
Price per 1,000 kcal$2.05$3.57
Owner rating4.7/5 (330 ratings)4.5/5 (1,352 ratings)
First ingredientDeboned TurkeyWhole Herring
FormDry (kibble)Dry (kibble)
Life stageAll life stagesAll life stages
Best forActive cats and growing kittens that need maximum protein, and multi-cat homes feeding dry onlyCats that need very high animal protein and omega-3, and poultry-sensitive cats

Where the difference actually comes from

The three-point gap is not about protein quantity โ€” Nulo's 41% as fed (about 46% dry-matter) actually edges Orijen's 40% (about 44%) on the label โ€” but about protein form and history. Orijen's top five are all whole, named fish: herring, salmon, flounder, Acadian redfish and monkfish, which is why it takes a perfect 100 on protein against Nulo's 95, whose panel is deboned turkey, turkey meal, chicken meal and deboned cod before whole peas. Safety is the second separator: 95 against 86, because Champion Petfoods has zero FDA or CFIA recalls across more than 40 years, while Nulo's clean sixteen-year run is co-packed โ€” its own FAQ describes a network of manufacturing partners rather than company-owned plants โ€” so a co-manufacturer's problem would arrive under the Nulo label. Standards follows, 84 against 80.

Where Nulo fights back is value, and it wins it decisively: 99 against 94. The 12 lb bag at $43.99 works out to about $2.05 per 1,000 kcal, roughly 43% less than Orijen's $3.57 โ€” and unlike Orijen it is not the most expensive dry food in the ranking but the fourth-cheapest cat food overall. Nulo also declares its omegas, calcium and phosphorus individually, and its owner rating (4.7/5 from 330 PetSmart reviews) runs ahead of Orijen's 4.5/5 from about 1,350 Chewy ratings, though on a much thinner base. Both are grain-free, all-life-stages formulas, and both share a practical caveat in opposite directions: Nulo is legume-heavy with whole peas and lentils at five and six, while Orijen's all-fish panel rules it out for cats with urinary histories.

The honest framing: Nulo gets you within three points of the best dry cat food here at well under two-thirds of the cost per calorie, with the higher labeled protein. What the premium buys with Orijen is ingredient form โ€” whole fish rather than meals โ€” and the depth of the documented record, 40 years against 16. For an active adult cat or a multi-cat house feeding dry only, Nulo is the rational buy. For an owner who weights manufacturing history heavily and can pay roughly 74% more per calorie, Orijen remains the ceiling of the category.

Which one should you buy?

Choose Nulo if

You want the best protein-per-dollar dry cat food in this ranking โ€” 41% as-fed protein at about $2.05 per 1,000 kcal โ€” and a co-packed sixteen-year clean record is acceptable.

Choose Orijen if

You want whole named fish rather than meals, the deepest documented recall record in the ranking, and you can pay about 74% more per calorie for both.

Pros and trade-offs

Nulo

What owners and our testing liked

  • 41% protein as fed - about 46% dry-matter, second only to Purina Pro Plan Kitten among dry cat foods here
  • Deboned turkey, turkey meal, chicken meal and deboned cod: four named animal ingredients in the top five
  • About $2.05 per 1,000 kcal - the fourth-cheapest cat food in this ranking
  • Declared omega-3 at 0.57% and omega-6 at 3.76%, with calcium 1.3% and phosphorus 0.9% on the label

Trade-offs

  • Whole peas and lentils at five and six - the carbohydrate load is legume-heavy
  • 330 PetSmart reviews is a thin base for the 4.7 average
  • 20% fat is a lot for a sedentary indoor cat
  • Formulated-to-meet only; Nulo publishes no feeding-trial validation for this recipe

Orijen

What owners and our testing liked

  • Six named whole fish - whole herring, salmon, flounder, Acadian redfish, monkfish and whole hake
  • 40% protein with 2% omega-3 and 0.65% EPA plus DHA, and 1.1% DHA declared on the label
  • All-life-stages statement covers kittens through seniors in one bag
  • Chicken-free, which makes it usable for cats with poultry sensitivities

Trade-offs

  • About $3.57 per 1,000 kcal - among the most expensive dry cat foods in this ranking per calorie
  • Very rich at 4,120 kcal/kg; free-feeding this is the fastest route to an overweight cat
  • Fish-heavy recipes are a poor choice for cats with a history of urinary crystals or fish allergy

Frequently asked questions

Nulo lists 41% protein and Orijen lists 40%. Why does Orijen score higher on protein?

Form, not quantity. Orijen's top five are all whole, named fish โ€” herring, salmon, flounder, Acadian redfish, monkfish โ€” which the algorithm scores above the meals and deboned meats that lead Nulo's panel (deboned turkey, turkey meal, chicken meal, deboned cod). Both clear the 28% dry-matter target for cats by a wide margin; the five-point protein-score gap is about ingredient form.

Is Nulo safe if it is co-packed?

Nothing in FDA's animal food listing or the independent recall archives matches any Nulo product across sixteen years of production. The caveat is structural rather than historical: Nulo co-packs through a network of manufacturing partners rather than company-owned plants, so a co-manufacturer's problem would arrive under the Nulo label. That is why it scores 86 on safety against Orijen's 95 โ€” not a black mark, a shorter and less controlled record.

Which is better for a cat with urinary crystals?

Neither is ideal, but Nulo is the safer of the two. Orijen Six Fish is an all-fish recipe, and fish-heavy formulas are a poor choice for cats with a history of lower-urinary-tract problems. Nulo is turkey-and-cod based, though legume-heavy with whole peas and lentils at five and six. For a cat with active urinary issues, ask your vet about a therapeutic urinary formula.

Want to compare more than two? Use the comparison tool โ€” up to four foods side by side. Individual animals vary; if your pet has a diagnosed condition, confirm the choice with your veterinarian.

More head-to-head comparisons

0 products selected